Sonar Sweep Protocol: Blind Defense Analysis Tools (2026)
June 2, 2026

Blind defense leaks hide in aggregate stats, not single-hand quizzes. Filter workflow for PT4/HM3/PokerCraft, four sonar layers (frequency, range, postflop, sizing), MDF sanity check, and weekly drill—tool-first, not flashcard-first.
- blind defense analysis
- BB defense
- poker software filters
- PokerTracker
- PokerCraft
- MDF
- leak analysis
- range study
Blind defense is not a personality test—it is a pattern on a sonar screen. You will not fix BB leaks by memorizing one chart; you fix them by sweeping your database for where chips leave your stack out of position. This article is about analysis tools and filter workflows, not a spot quiz. If you want interactive blind-defense drills, use a range trainer separately.
What Sonar Actually Measures
| Signal | Software source | Healthy direction |
|---|---|---|
| BB VPIP vs BTN open | PT4/HM3 filter: Hero BB, Villain BTN raise | Defend enough to avoid over-folding; not so wide that postflop spew dominates |
| Fold to steal (SB/BB) | PokerCraft positional stats, HUD-free rooms | Extreme high fold → bleed; extreme low → postflop disaster |
| BB BB/100 by opener position | Tier-A positional reports | Worst vs BTN/SB first in queue |
| 3-bet defense vs open | Filter: faced raise, hero 3-bet or call | Cold-call frequency vs 3-bet frequency imbalance |
GGPoker official guidance places VPIP in a 22–28% band and 3-bet around 6–10% for 6-max self-check—not blind-specific, but BB numbers that diverge wildly from table average flag a sweep.
Tool Bench for Blind Defense Study
| Tool | Blind-defense strength | Limit |
|---|---|---|
| PokerTracker 4 / HM3 | Custom filters: position, action, stack, pot type; BB/100 splits | Needs HH import; anonymized GG names |
| PokerCraft | Free positional dashboard, replayer, Hand Moments | No cross-site; rake excluded from profit |
| Leak Buster 3 | Ranks blind-defense EV loss; drill mode | Requires PT4/HM3 database |
| Range trainers (BBZ, Oracle, etc.) | Preflop defend grids vs open size | Preflop only—pair with HH filters for postflop |
| MassBuster / pool tools | Population fold/overfold vs steal | Pool data, not your personal leak |
Workflow principle: Tier-A filter → flag street → replayer → one rule change. Not: watch a solver video → hope.
Four-Layer Sonar Sweep
Layer 1 — Frequency ping
Filter last 5k–20k hands: Hero in BB, faced single raise, no squeeze.
Record:
- Defend rate (call + 3-bet) vs BTN 2.2–2.5x
- Defend rate vs SB complete/open
- 3-bet % vs call % split
Compare to MDF baseline for pot odds: if villain opens 2.5bb and you must call 1.5bb more, pot is roughly 5.5bb before call → MDF ≈ 5.5 ÷ (5.5 + 1.5) ≈ 79% of continuing combos in theory—not 79% of all 1326 hands. Software shows your actual continue frequency; large gap below MDF on dry steal lines → over-folding leak.
Layer 2 — Range composition
Export or tag defended hands. Sort by hand class:
- Suited connectors / suited aces — high realization OOP
- Offsuit broadways — often over-defended by beginners
- Dominated offsuit (K8o, Q7o) — classic BB bleed
Range trainers show solver preflop grids; your database shows what you actually defended. Gold cells in trainers mean nothing if Layer 1 frequency is wrong.
Layer 3 — Postflop echo
Filter defended BB pots that saw flop. Split:
- Check-fold to c-bet %
- Check-raise frequency
- Call flop, fold turn (the "float then surrender" leak)
PokerCraft replayer + street notes beat raw stats when sample is small. Tag ten losing BB pots per week—pattern appears fast.
Layer 4 — Sizing response
Same filter, add villain c-bet size bucket: ≤33% pot, 50–75%, ≥100%.
Over-folding vs small c-bets is a software-visible leak. Under-check-raising vs large polar bets on dry boards leaves EV on table. No solver percentage needed—compare your fold line to pot odds per bucket.
Worked Filter Recipe (PT4/HM3 Style)
- Hero position = BB
- Preflop: faced raise, one caller max (SRP focus first)
- Villain position = BTN (repeat for SB, CO)
- Stack depth 80–120bb (adjust for your game)
- Sort by amount won/lost
- Replay top 10 losers—not winners
Ask each hand: Was preflop continue correct at this price? If yes, postflop line is the leak. If no, fix range before studying turn strategy.
MDF Sanity Check (No Fake Solver Lines)
When facing a c-bet after defending:
- MDF = pot ÷ (pot + bet)
- Example: pot $40, bet $20 → MDF = 40/60 ≈ 67% of range continues
Use MDF as a defense budget, not a mandate to call every gutshot. Software tells you whether you mass-fold below budget (exploitable) or mass-call above it (postflop bleed).
Weekly 45-Minute Drill
| Minute block | Task |
|---|---|
| 0–10 | Run Layer 1 filter; write defend % vs BTN |
| 10–25 | Replay five biggest BB losers from filter |
| 25–35 | Open range trainer: BB vs BTN 2.5x at your depth; fix preflop gaps |
| 35–45 | Pick one rule: e.g., "fold K8o–Q8o vs BTN at NL50" or "check-raise more vs 33% c-bet on A-high dry" |
One rule per week beats ten solver trees.
Common Tool Mistakes
- Studying ranges before measuring frequency — pretty chart, same leak.
- Only reviewing hero calls that won — confirms bias, not edge.
- Ignoring SB vs BB difference — SB defense has different pot odds and 3-bet dynamics; filter separately.
- Chasing population stats without HH — pool tools inform exploits; personal filters fix your graph.
Blind defense analysis tools turn BB from a money pit into a scannable signal. Run the four layers monthly; let frequency lead, ranges follow, postflop refine. The sonar ping you want is not "I feel tight"—it is a filter result you can screenshot and compare next month.